.jpg)
Deadlines in Software Development: A Double-Edged Sword
Explore the role of deadlines in software development, weighing their pros and cons, and comparing continuous deployment to deadline-driven approaches.
Startups can gain budget efficiency by interpreting time logs correctly. Learn how to stop focusing on hours and start analyzing scope to cut waste and protect your runway.
For any startup, every euro holds immense value. You track your development hours carefully. But are you getting the right information from that data? Many companies make a critical mistake. They fixate on the number of hours worked. They do not check if that work aligns with their main priorities. This is where the Ottia Framework can help. It introduces a second layer of key performance indicators, or KPIs. The framework compares estimated hours against actual hours spent. This simple comparison turns raw time data into powerful knowledge. It helps govern budget allocation, clarify project scope, and support strategic delivery.
Two numbers are central to this process. The first is estimated hours. This is the planned time needed to finish a task, which the team agrees on before work starts. The second number is actual hours. This is the real time a developer spends on that same task.
Measuring the difference between these two numbers gives startups a clear advantage.
Teams often ask the wrong question. They see a task took 20 hours instead of the planned 10. So they ask, “Why did this take so long?” This question misses the real issue. The problem is not just about the hours. It is about what the work included.
Tasks are not all the same. A 10-hour task with a clear scope and no third-party needs is simple. A different 10-hour task can become very complex. It might unexpectedly require talking to another company's API. It could involve refactoring old code or setting up a new technical environment. These unplanned items expand the scope.
Ottia’s post, “Why Focusing on Scope — Not Hours,” explains this point well: “Hours tell how long, scope tells what and why.” This idea is the foundation of budget efficiency. You should always audit the scope first. Then you can analyze the hours.
The Ottia platform provides a clear path to better budget control. It relies on a consistent process of tracking, calculating, and analyzing time data. This process helps teams find and fix issues early.
The first step is disciplined data collection. When working with Ottia, every task logs critical information. This includes the task name and a detailed description of its scope. It also includes the estimated hours needed for completion. After the developer finishes the work, the actual hours are logged. This creates a clean record for every piece of work the team performs. Without this basic data, you cannot find patterns or problems.
Once you have the data, you need to see it clearly. Ottia calculates the difference between planned and completed work. This difference is the variance.
The formula is simple: Hours Variance = Actual Hours − Estimated Hours.
This variance is then grouped by different project areas. You can see the total variance for a big feature, called an epic. You can see it for a single sprint. Or you can see it for a specific part of your product. This dashboard shows you exactly where your estimates do not match reality. It acts as an early warning system.
A small difference between estimated and actual hours is normal. But what happens when the variance is large, like 20 or 30 percent? When a task goes far over its estimate, the team must ask why.
Was the scope of the task unclear from the start? Did the scope change during the work? Were there dependencies that caused delays? For instance, did the developer have to wait for an API from another team? Did blockers or hand-offs between team members add extra time? Asking these questions helps you find the root cause. This is much more productive than just blaming a developer for taking too long.
The analysis will point to one of two problems. The issue is either with the scope or with the team's process.
If the scope was the problem, the solution is to improve clarity. For the next task, the team should write a more detailed scope. Or you should slice large tasks into smaller, more manageable steps. Each small step will have its own clear scope and estimate.
If the team's process was the problem, you adjust how you work. You can add a time buffer for complex tasks. You can formally schedule time for quality assurance checks or integration work. You could also introduce paired code reviews to catch problems sooner.
Let's look at a concrete example. A team estimates 8 hours for a new "payment flow" feature. After completion, the records show it took 16 hours. The variance is +100 percent, a major overrun.
The delta dashboard in Ottia flags this task right away. The project manager reviews the work. The review shows a lot of hidden work that was not in the original scope. The developer spent 3 hours refactoring old code to make the new feature work. They spent another 4 hours testing the flow on multiple devices. An extra hour went to handling a specific security token issue.
This analysis provides a clear lesson. The team learns to re-scope its future tasks. Big features are broken into smaller, well-defined subtasks. For instance, "Refactor old payment code" becomes its own task with its own estimate. The team also decides to add a standard 25 percent buffer to future estimates. This buffer accounts for testing and integration time.
Controlling your budget is a top priority for any young company. This method of tracking and analyzing time delivers many benefits.
First, it gives you direct budget control. You can avoid surprise overruns that burn through your limited cash. Second, it leads to more predictable delivery schedules. More accurate scopes result in more reliable release plans. Third, it builds investor confidence. Transparent KPIs show stakeholders that you manage their money well. Finally, it creates a cycle of continuous improvement. Each sprint helps you calibrate better estimates for the future.
You can begin applying these ideas today.
Budget efficiency is not about just tracking time. It is about making sure every logged hour pushes your business forward. For startups, mastering the relationship between estimated and actual hours is critical. It protects your budget, your roadmap, and your runway.
With 3000+ professionals on board, we’re ready to assist you with full-cycle development.
.jpg)
.jpg)